“Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets; and Allah has full knowledge of all things.” (Chapter 33 verse 41)
This verse clearly shows us that Holy Prophet(saw) is the seal of all of the prophets which shows his status. To say that an Israeli prophet would come to support him with the triumph of Islam makes no sense whatsoever, and kind of gives the impression that no one from the Ummah of Muhammad(Saw) had the ability to give Islam victory.
These ideas are absurd. This verse shows us that the one to come for Islam would be under the seal of Muhammad(Saw) And we know Muhammad(saw) is the last law bearing prophet and that a messenger can only come who is his follower and his shariah. Isa(as) was under the shariah of Moses(as) as Quran and the biblical scriptures tell us, so the idea of him coming makes no sense whatsoever and causes not only contradictions in the Qur’an alone, rather in the ahadith also which clearly state Isa(as) was sent to the children of Israel rather than to entire mankind.
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas states:
“The true connotation of Khatamun Nabiyyin requires that if anyone calls himself a Prophet while there remains the slightest veil of estrangement, such a person will be guilty of breaking the Seal of Khatamun Nabiyyin. But he who is so lost in the Khatamun Nabiyyinsa that he receives hissa name and reflects hissa countenance, will, on account of this complete unity and harmony, be called a Prophet without contravening the Seal; for he is Muhammadsa, though by way of Zill.
Thus, despite the claim of Prophethood by the person who is named Muhammad and Ahmad by way of Zill, our lord and master Muhammadsa would still be the Khatamun Nabiyyin, inasmuch as this second Muhammad is a reflection of the same Muhammad(saw) and bears his name. But Jesusas cannot come without breaking the Seal inasmuch as his is a separate and distinct Prophethood” (A Misconception Removed, Page 7)