Both Messiahs To Resemble Urwa Bin Masud?

Both Messiahs To Resemble Urwa Bin Masud?

The allegation of the non Ahmadi Muslims is that in Sahih Muslim the Holy Prophet^saw has been recorded to have said that Isa^as who was sent to Bani Israel resembled Urwa bin Masud, while in Sahih Muslim again in regards to the latter day messiah, he^saw has also said the same. First of all when we look at the most authentic book after the Qur’an, Bukhari, we are told that the messiahs would not resemble each other and be two different people.

He^saw states in regards to the description of the messiah^as sent to Bani Israel:

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ كَثِيرٍ، أَخْبَرَنَا إِسْرَائِيلُ، أَخْبَرَنَا عُثْمَانُ بْنُ الْمُغِيرَةِ، عَنْ مُجَاهِدٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ قَالَ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ “‏ رَأَيْتُ عِيسَى وَمُوسَى وَإِبْرَاهِيمَ، فَأَمَّا عِيسَى فَأَحْمَرُ جَعْدٌ عَرِيضُ الصَّدْرِ، وَأَمَّا مُوسَى فَآدَمُ جَسِيمٌ سَبْطٌ كَأَنَّهُ مِنْ رِجَالِ الزُّطِّ ‏”‏‏.‏

Narrated Ibn `Abbas: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “I saw Moses, Jesus and Abraham (on the night of my Ascension to the heavens). Jesus was of red complexion, curly hair and a broad chest. Moses was of brown complexion, straight hair and tall stature as if he was from the people of Az-Zutt.” (Bukhari Volume 5, book 55, Hadith 648)

He^saw states in regards to the Messiah of the end times who was to be from our ummah:

حَدَّثَنَا إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ الْمُنْذِرِ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو ضَمْرَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، قَالَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ ذَكَرَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَوْمًا بَيْنَ ظَهْرَىِ النَّاسِ الْمَسِيحَ الدَّجَّالَ، فَقَالَ ‏”‏ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَيْسَ بِأَعْوَرَ، أَلاَ إِنَّ الْمَسِيحَ الدَّجَّالَ أَعْوَرُ الْعَيْنِ الْيُمْنَى، كَأَنَّ عَيْنَهُ عِنَبَةٌ طَافِيَةٌ ‏”‏‏.‏ ‏”‏ وَأَرَانِي اللَّيْلَةَ عِنْدَ الْكَعْبَةِ فِي الْمَنَامِ، فَإِذَا رَجُلٌ آدَمُ كَأَحْسَنِ مَا يُرَى مِنْ أُدْمِ الرِّجَالِ، تَضْرِبُ لِمَّتُهُ بَيْنَ مَنْكِبَيْهِ، رَجِلُ الشَّعَرِ، يَقْطُرُ رَأْسُهُ مَاءً، وَاضِعًا يَدَيْهِ عَلَى مَنْكِبَىْ رَجُلَيْنِ وَهْوَ يَطُوفُ بِالْبَيْتِ‏.‏ فَقُلْتُ مَنْ هَذَا فَقَالُوا هَذَا الْمَسِيحُ ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ‏.‏ ثُمَّ رَأَيْتُ رَجُلاً وَرَاءَهُ جَعْدًا قَطَطًا أَعْوَرَ عَيْنِ الْيُمْنَى كَأَشْبَهِ مَنْ رَأَيْتُ بِابْنِ قَطَنٍ، وَاضِعًا يَدَيْهِ عَلَى مَنْكِبَىْ رَجُلٍ، يَطُوفُ بِالْبَيْتِ، فَقُلْتُ مَنْ هَذَا قَالُوا الْمَسِيحُ الدَّجَّالُ ‏”‏‏.‏ تَابَعَهُ عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ عَنْ نَافِعٍ‏.‏

Narrated `Abdullah: The Prophet (ﷺ) mentioned the Masih Ad-Dajjal in front of the people saying, Allah is not one-eyed while Masih Ad-Dajjal is blind in the right eye and his eye looks like a bulging out grape. While sleeping near the Ka`ba last night, I saw in my dream a man of brown color the best one can see amongst brown color and his hair was long that it fell between his shoulders. His hair was lank and water was dribbling from his head and he was placing his hands on the shoulders of two men while circumambulating the Ka`ba. I asked, ‘Who is this?’ They replied, ‘This is Jesus, son of Mary.’ Behind him I saw a man who had very curly hair and was blind in the right eye, resembling Ibn Qatan (i.e. an infidel) in appearance. He was placing his hands on the shoulders of a person while performing Tawaf around the Ka`ba. I asked, ‘Who is this? ‘They replied, ‘The Masih, Ad-Dajjal.’ (sahih Bukhari Volume 4, book 55, Hadith #649)

There have been attempts to state that the Prophet^saw did not mention Isa^asbeing of reddish complexion. This is a total confusion which is not true at all. All the descriptions of the Messiah sent to Bani Israel always mentions reddish complexion, while the latter always mentions brown complexion. The Prophet Muhammad^saw has clearly showed a distinction between the Messiahs.

Another beautiful point to notice is that all Muslims know that the one to revive Islam would be the same Messiah who was prophesied about. We all know that Isa^as was of Bani Israel, however, Muhammad^saw made it clear that the one to revive Islam would be of the Persian Lineage, as Ahmad^as was:

حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ الْعَزِيزِ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي سُلَيْمَانُ بْنُ بِلاَلٍ، عَنْ ثَوْرٍ، عَنْ أَبِي الْغَيْثِ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، رضى الله عنه قَالَ كُنَّا جُلُوسًا عِنْدَ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَأُنْزِلَتْ عَلَيْهِ سُورَةُ الْجُمُعَةِ ‏{‏وَآخَرِينَ مِنْهُمْ لَمَّا يَلْحَقُوا بِهِمْ‏}‏ قَالَ قُلْتُ مَنْ هُمْ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ فَلَمْ يُرَاجِعْهُ حَتَّى سَأَلَ ثَلاَثًا، وَفِينَا سَلْمَانُ الْفَارِسِيُّ، وَضَعَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَدَهُ عَلَى سَلْمَانَ ثُمَّ قَالَ ‏”‏ لَوْ كَانَ الإِيمَانُ عِنْدَ الثُّرَيَّا لَنَالَهُ رِجَالٌ ـ أَوْ رَجُلٌ ـ مِنْ هَؤُلاَءِ ‏”‏‏.‏

Narrated Abu Huraira: While we were sitting with the Prophet (ﷺ) Surat Al-Jumu’a was revealed to him, and when the Verse, “And He (Allah) has sent him (Muhammad) also to other (Muslims)…..’ (62.3) was recited by the Prophet, I said, “Who are they, O Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ)?” The Prophet (ﷺ) did not reply till I repeated my question thrice. At that time, Salman Al-Farisi was with us. So Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) put his hand on Salman, saying, “If Faith were at (the place of) Ath-Thuraiya (pleiades, the highest star), even then a man from these people (i.e. Salman’s folk) would attain it.” (Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Hadith #4897)

Another important point is that when Muhammad^saw mentions the Messiah^asof the past, he^saw mentions him being in the company of the dead, who include Moses^as and Abraham^as, and when he^saw mentions the latter day messiah^as, he^saw mentions its company with the living dajjal rather than the dead.

According to the most authentic book after the Qur’an known as Bukhari, the messiahs would not resemble each other. Now when we look at the Sahih Muslim Ahadith quoted we learn that these two are not reliable at all. Firstly because these sayings contradict Bukhari,and secondly because of their weak chain of narrations.

When we look at the first chain which states that Isa^as resembled Urwa Bin Masud, the chain shows us that this is not sahih. Abu Zubair Muhammadun Musrik Makki is one of the people in this chain and it has been said about him in Asmaul Rijal, that this person is not trustable, he added stuff, he lied and he did zina. How can we trust such a person and use his statements? Some try to state that he was a different Abu Zubair and not the one from Mecca but this is a complete lie.

In regards to the second hadith, there is someone named Ubaidulla Ibn Mu’adh al Anbari and under him it is stated in Asmaul Rijal that he is not an alim of hadith, he is nothing. If Asmaul Rijal states such about the narrators how can we leave the most authentic book after the Qur’an and leave the Qur’an which declares Isa^as as one who has died, over such false narrations? The statement that a person has narrations in Sahih Bukhari does not make all of their narrations authentic. The main point which the non Ahmadi Muslims forget is that their description is different in Bukhari, and that the death of Isa^as is clear from the Qur’an. Even if these narrations were so called authentic, it would not be a strong enough point to trust them over the Qur’an and Bukhari. Another narration is also quoted which has a huge gap in its narration, which further proves the inauthenticity of these traditions.